Censored in Great Britain
THE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF SURVIVAL AFTER
DEATH
By Michael Roll
Here is an extraordinary paradox. Only those who
can be relied upon to dismiss the findings and conclusions of
our pioneers of radio and television are allowed on radio and
television!
Our scientists who support the British pioneers
of radio and television - Sir William Crookes, Sir Oliver Lodge and John Logie Baird -
have been blocked from speaking on the radio or appearing on
television. Only a handful of local radio presenters have
defied this official and unofficial censorship, notably James
Whale.
There are two expert opinions as to what
so-called paranormal phenomena are, but in this "free" country
the British people are only allowed access to the explanation
that is politically correct, the first version that is listed
below, because it is no danger to the powerful religious and
scientific establishments:
1. Paranormal Phenomena Do Not Exist
The mind and the brain are the same. This is the
official teaching across all scientific disciplines. The
parapsychologist Dr. Susan Blackmore has been given complete
freedom of every radio and television programme that is meant
to be examining the subject. This is because she is the
establishment mouthpiece and can be relied upon to never
mention what is revealed in this pamphlet. Dr. Blackmore
protects the scientific establishment's adopted stance, which
only gives a materialistic model of the universe. Professor J.
Wheeler, a top physicist, stated in 1994 that acceptance of
survival or paranormal phenomena would destroy the basis of
science as taught in our universities.
2. Paranormal Phenomena Do Exist
The mind and the brain are separate. This
pamphlet carries on where Crookes, Lodge and Logie Baird left
off. This is what we are never allowed to hear on radio and
television or read about in scientific magazines and large
circulation papers.
"The suppression of uncomfortable ideas may be
common in religion and politics, but it is not the path to
knowledge, it has no place in the endeavour of science."
Carl Sagan. "Cosmos" 1980
A great moment in television history was
featured in Carl Sagan's outstanding thirteen-part series on
astronomy called "Cosmos". He was pictured in New York library
surrounded by millions of books. He pointed to a tiny section
and said:
"It is only possible in one person's
lifetime to read this many books."
He then turned to the camera and made the
following profound statement:
"The trick is to read the right
books."
The books discussed in this pamphlet are the
ones that the religious and pseudo-scientific establishments
are praying with all their might that the people never find
out about.
"I completely agree with Michael Roll's
arguments about the reality of paranormal phenomena and the
existence of a normally unseen world... Quantum Physics: the
presence of a wave nature in subatomic particles. The vital
difference between a wave and a solid particle is the wave
properties of superposition and modulation. Put simply,
these properties allow waves of different frequencies to
occupy the same space without direct interaction. Therefore
it is quite possible for parallel universes to exist
separated by a difference in some fundamental wave
characteristic. This theory springs directly from wave
mechanics which unfortunately was not available to the
Victorian researchers when the greatest breakthroughs with
mediumship were made."
Michael Scott BSc. Graduate in Astrophysics,
Edinburgh University
WHAT IS MEANT BY SCIENTIFIC PROOF?
This must consist of repeatable experiments
backed up with a theory that has a mathematical base. A good
example is proving that the world is round and not flat. The
Greek scientist Pythagoras was the first to put forward the
idea that the world was round. This was 2,600 years ago.
However, it was 300 years later that another Greek scientist -
Eratosthenes - came up with the mathematical theory for a
round earth. This lacked the scientific impact it should have
had because the experiment had not taken place. This came much
later when Magellan's crew sailed round the world in 1522. The
experiment together with the mathematical theory completely,
destroyed the medieval obscurants - the Flat Earth religious
fanatics.
Proving survival after death is exactly the
same, but not quite as easy, because here we are dealing with
phenomena that are beyond the range of our five physical
senses. In order to detect this type of phenomena we have to
work with a medium - a machine that can do the job.
It was the invention of the achromatic
microscope in 1830 by Joseph Jackson Lister that enabled his
son to write his paper on antiseptic surgery. From this moment
on we have had the proof that reality also exists in the
invisible. Radio and television sets are also detecting
normally invisible phenomena. They are mediums sorting out
signals at different frequencies. This is the reason why we
are forced to work with a human medium in order to prove
survival after death. No machine invented so far is as
sophisticated as the human mind and brain. However we have to
be extra careful when carrying out experiments using people.
There can be no room for error where lives are concerned.
THE EXPERIMENTAL PROOF OF SURVIVAL AFTER
DEATH
We have had the experimental proof of survival
after death ever since Sir William Crookes published the
results of his experiments in the leading scientific journal
of his day - The Quarterly Journal of Science - in 1874. These
were repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions.
International teams of scientists then repeated the
experiments and obtained the same results. People who had once
lived on earth came back and proved to these scientific teams
that they had conquered death and were still very much alive.
This is what Professor Charles Richet, the French Nobel
Laureate for medical science, said about the experiments:
"There is ample proof that experimental
materialisations should take definite rank as a scientific
fact."
The purpose of this pamphlet is only to bring to
peoples' attention these exciting discoveries in subatomic
physics. My job is easy, all I have to do is point to the
books that have been published, but suppressed. The main
reason why this incredible scientific discovery did not cause
a revolution at the beginning of this century is because these
experiments lacked the backing of any detailed mathematical
theory. This is what Sir Oliver Lodge said in 1929:
"We have to be guided by the facts; and if the
facts seem incredible as the they do - we have first of all
to assure ourselves that they are facts, and then conclude
that there is a department of knowledge to which we have as
yet not got the key."
At the end of the century we now have the key,
the missing mathematical theory to back up these
revolutionary, scientific experiments.
References
Lodge, Sir Oliver "Phantom
Walls" 1929 (Hodder & Stoughton)
Medhurst, Dr. R.G. "Crookes and
the Spirit World" 1972 (Souvenir)
Crookes, Sir William
"Experimental Investigation of a New Force" Article in
"Quarterly Journal of Science" July 1, 1871 (Early
experiments)
Richet, Professor Charles
"Thirty Years of Psychical Research" 1923 (W. Collins &
Sons). The French scientific team.
von Schrenck Notzing, Baron
"Phenomena of Materialisations" 1923 (Kegan Paul.
Trench. Trubner). The German scientific team.
Hamilton, Dr. T. Glen
"Intention and Survival" 1942. (Regency Press) The Canadian
scientific team.
Warrick, F. W. "Experiments in
Psychics" 1939 (Rider & Co. London)
THE ETHERIC WORLD MUST HAVE AN
ASTRONOMICAL LOCALITY
As Sir Oliver Lodge and Sir William Crookes were
pioneers of radio and television, they were able to put
forward a rational explanation to account for the seemingly
"supernatural" phenomena appearing at their experiments. They
said that this etheric world is the same place as our radio
and television signals, but at a much higher frequency. Recent
discoveries in quantum mechanics - the study of the building
blocks within the atom - completely vindicate what these great
physicists said at the beginning of the century.
They were adamant that we all survive the death
of our physical bodies. The experiments proved that we must
possess two bodies - one finite body containing the brain that
dies, and another infinite body, containing the mind that
separates when our short stay on earth is over. Lodge said the
people from the "next world" who are appearing at the
experiments must possess bodies that are made of the same
invisible matter as our radio and television signals. He
called it an etheric substance.
Few will disagree that the discovery of this
etheric substance is the most important scientific
breakthrough in history. I must admit to jumping the gun and
getting overexcited when I saw a report in the "Sunday Times"
on 13th December 1981. It said that physicists could have been
wrong for forty years about the make-up of the universe. They
were saying that nine tenths of the universe is missing. When
we look through a telescope at a galaxy we are only seeing one
tenth of the mass. The motion of distant galaxies and the
stars in them can only be accounted for under the laws of
gravity if there is far more mass associated with each galaxy
than there is in the visible stars that comprise it. One
theory for this missing mass was centred around a ghostlike
subatomic particle called the neutrino that was discovered in
1956. The report said a neutrino would stand a good chance of
penetrating a thickness of lead stretching to the nearest star
without hitting anything. This really caught my imagination.
Arthur Koestler showed in his book "The Roots of Coincidence"
that science had discovered something in the building blocks
of nature that started to give a rational explanation
accounting for the millions of reports from people who say
they saw a "ghost" walk through a solid wall. However, my
astrophysicist pals Mike Scott and Sam Nicholls, although very
supportive of the survival theory, did not share my enthusiasm
that the neutrino was the missing piece needed to make up the
etheric universe.
References
Lodge, Sir Oliver "Ether and
Reality" 1925 (Hodder & Stoughton)
Koestler, Arthur "The Roots of
Coincidence" 1972 (Hutchinson)
RONALD PEARSON BSc DISCOVERS THE UNSEEN AND
NORMALLY UNSENSED UNIVERSE
"It was Einstein's materialistic Theory of
Relativity that destroyed Sir Oliver Lodge's Theory of the
Ether."
Sam Nicholls MSc
With the benefit of hindsight we now know that a
scientific disaster took place when Sir Isaac Newton's model
of the universe was discarded and replaced by Einstein's
Theory of Relativity. Einstein said on his 70th birthday:
"Now you think I am looking at my life's work
with calm satisfaction. But there is not a single concept of
which I am convinced that it will stand firm. I am not sure
if I was on the right track after all."
If only our contemporary physicists had shared
Einstein's scepticism then we would not have wasted so much
time and money trying to match up Niels Bohr's quantum
mechanics with relativity. Even the Einstein supporter
Professor Stephen Hawking from Cambridge University admits
that they are incompatible. Apart from in Russia and a few
"heretics" in the West, the whole of orthodox science is
locked into a largely false and hopelessly outdated scientific
theory. We are being subjected to one extraordinary theory
after another, ranging from us being able to go back in time
and murder our grandparents and then to somehow be born in
another universe, to the questionable Big Bang theory that
says every galaxy in the universe started from the size of a
pin head at a single point in time! This is the sort of
scenario we end up with if we start our calculations from a
false base. Only those of us who are outside of the university
sausage machine are in a position to challenge orthodox
scientific thinking. The physics students are powerless. They
would not get their degrees if they told the truth. They know
what happened to one of our leading scientists who had the
courage to say Einstein's Theory of Relativity is incorrect.
Dr. Louis Essen D.Sc. FRS, OBE, is the inventor of the atomic
clock. For trying to bring common sense back into physics he
was told further such activity would place the tenure of his
post in jeopardy. Into this scientific vacuum has stepped a
retired university lecturer with a background in engineering,
Ronald Pearson from Bath. Thankfully,
Mr. Pearson no longer has to watch out for peer pressure in
order to keep his university appointment. However, he is still
at the mercy of the peer-referee system. This is just a
euphemism for censorship - keeping the old-boy network intact.
Before any scientific theory can see the light of day it has
to run the gauntlet of politically correct scientists who are
worshipping at the shrine of Einstein's Theory of Relativity.
This way no constructive criticism ever comes to the attention
of students or the public in quality scientific magazines, the
press or on radio and television. Engineers do not have the
freedom to indulge in any scientific flights of fancy,
otherwise all their structures will come tumbling down and
their machines will blow up or crash. These practical men and
women act as a sort of scientific brake. This is why many of
the world's greatest scientists have come from the ranks of
engineers. Ronald Pearson has discovered Sir Oliver Lodge's
etheric substance and outside of Russia hardly anybody knows
about it! He has completely discarded Einstein's outdated
Theory of Relativity and just made a couple of additions to
Sir Isaac Newton's physical laws. They now match up with
quantum mechanics and provide a totally satisfactory solution
for quantum gravitation. Mr. Pearson attended the Sir Isaac
Newton Conference in 1991, which was held in St. Petersburg,
Russia. His scientific paper has been well received and
published. This outstanding British scientist is recognised in
Russia, but has not even been reported in his own country. He
has been peer-refereed out of the game. As a rugby player this
makes me very angry because I was brought up with great
respect for the good word of referee. It is obvious that what
Mr. Pearson has discovered is much too close to the truth for
comfort, because if his work was a load of rubbish it would be
brought out in the open and exposed. This great scientific
breakthrough actually started in 1933 when Pauli predicted
that there may well be particles within the atom other than
the proton, electron and the recently discovered neutron that
would revolutionise scientific thinking. We have now
discovered over 200 subatomic particles making up our physical
universe, coming under the general heading of quarks and
leptons. In order to discover the etheric world Mr. Pearson
has taken a step further and pointed out that everything we
have discovered so far within the atom is being produced from
smaller primary particles at a sub-quantum level. His
mathematically based theory proves that when primaries of
positive and negative energy collide they breed! This yields
an exciting new mechanism for the creation of an expanding
universe. This is similar to what we are witnessing in nature
all around us. An equation we can all immediately understand.
Male + Female = New Individuals. It is never a bad rule of
thumb to look around at nature's wonders when we are trying to
find the answers to cosmic mysteries. When we consider that
even a solid lump of granite consists of mostly empty space
and even the building blocks of the "solid" bits protons,
neutrons and electrons cannot be seen even under the most
powerful microscopes. Therefore, it is no longer so fantastic
to accept the seemingly crazy idea that the life force that
drives our physical body on earth can continue when it packs
in ("gives up the ghost"). For example, on a television
interview just prior to his death in 1988, Professor Richard
P. Feynman, a Nobel Laureate for Physics, made the following
statement.
"If your theories and mathematics do not match
the experiment, then they are wrong."
Einstein's Theory of Relativity cannot match the
experiment where people who once lived on earth come back and
prove they are still alive, because this theory is
incompatible with even the very existence of an ether. Ronald
Pearson's Theory of the Ether most certainly does. It shows
the ether having a complex structure, intelligence and
conscious, to be the core ingredient.
The great strength of the powerful materialists
who control orthodox scientific thinking is that they are
banking on the fact that most people are not making an effort
to understand even basic subatomic physics. Even a cursory
glance at the subject shows that the physical universe is
being produced from the invisible - the etheric universe.
Please spike the guns of the "when-you're-dead,-you're-dead"
merchants. Read Professor Richard Feynman's layman's guide to
subatomic physics obtainable from bookshops and the library -
QED. Once people have read the physicists' and rationalists'
case explaining so-called paranormal phenomena they
automatically become immune from falling for any supernatural
absurdities. Never again will the masses fall under the spell
of priestcraft. Never again will people be fooled by
pseudo-scientists who are guilty of suppressing uncomfortable
discoveries in physics solely to keep their power structures
intact.
References
Pearson, R.D. "Intelligence Behind The Universe" This
shows how enlightened physics can explain the so-called
paranormal and solve the most intractable problems of
cosmology.
Pearson, R.D. "Origin of Mind". This is Mr. Pearson's
lecture showing that our minds are immortal. Pearson's thesis
now published in the U.S.A. by the Center for Frontier
Sciences - Temple University. Philadelphia. He is still
censored in his own country up to March, 1998.
Pearson, R.D. "Key To Consciousness: Quantum -
Gravitation".
You can order the above publications by writing
to Michael Roll.
Feynman, Richard P. "QED". 1985
(Princeton University press)
Essen, Dr. Louis D.Sc. FRS.
OBE. "Relativity - Joke or Swindle?"
(Electronics & Wireless World). This criticism of
Einstein's Theory of Relativity by the inventor of the atomic
clock is censored in all mainstream scientific publications.
It was Rutherford who thought Einstein's Theory of Relativity
was a joke!
"Quarks and Leptons: The New Elementary
Particles?" Proceedings of The Royal Society of
London. 8th April, 1986.
| 
